Alternatives – how to successfully

alternatives – hοw successful

background

Peter Radford writes Articles wіth Websites οn a wide range οf topics. alternatives Arе Website contain a total οf 66 profile οf a site profile οf a blog

Sοmе comments, qυеѕtіοnѕ аnd criticisms I hаνе fοr mу Trυе News Video, hοw people talk аbουt socialized medicine gеt. Article: City-journal.org Frοm Radio Free Domain, thе lаrgеѕt аnd mοѕt рοрυlаr ѕhοw іn thе world οf philosophy – www.freedomainradio.com Video Rating: 5.4 More

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

25 Responses to “Alternatives – how to successfully”

  • nurbSoldier:

    @givethemahand besides, Stef is totally in favor of actual reform. He wants healthcare to be a free market function, not 66% government controlled, cartelized and paid for (which is the status quo), nor does he want healthcare to be even more mediocre (like the ones that are 100% government run and paid for).

  • nurbSoldier:

    @givethemahand It doesn’t seem to make any difference to the “reform” crowd that the US government fails at most of what it does or that Obama has broken so many of his other campaign promises.
    Personally I am getting sick of idiots who think that some retard (US Government) is going to somehow pass the calculus exam (making a better healthcare system).

  • Samhainlilly:

    Please could you tell me where the link is for that article, it is off great interest to me as I am in the UK, Thank you.
    Please keep up the good work while you can and I can still watch you (Euro Digital bill) . :)

  • rockstarofredondo:

    I say people soak up as much benefits as they can while this system is going through it’s final death throes. Get financial aid, apply for every financial benefit you “qualify” for & take in as much as you can in the way of “public” benefits. I think it will help kill this system off faster.

  • givethemahand:

    It doesn’t seem to make any difference to the anti reform crowd that the recently passed US reforms have very little in common with the UK or Canada systems.

    Personally i am getting pretty sick of straw-man arguments that compare the US health care bill with UK or Canada. Its like comparing apples and oranges.. actually more like apples and hockey sticks.

  • newperve:

    Note that this is from the Guardian, not exactly a free market champion.

  • jerami101:

    4:17, you need to do that more! I love it, it keeps people’s attention. Peace brother…

  • codylee469you:

    Everyone wants to get all crazy over this peice of legislation…..i vote and make my opinion on what i feel is best for me and my family….which is what we all do right? Well when a bill affects my job and my way of life i am opposed to it……Just be thankful we are able to respectfully disagree about this…..if the people wanna change it then do it with your vote in November…..stick to what you believe and never let anyone stray you from what you feel is right….

  • SanieClaws:

    @fiftycaliberfistfuck

    Less stealing isn’t better than more stealing because stealing is wrong. Even if money is stolen and then spent for you, it’s wrong to steal.

  • RLore18:

    @yo1dude1man
    The only reason anyone could be forced to comply with an insurance company’s edict on payouts would be if the state enforced such edicts with violence. The amount of choice involved in your purchases is directly proportionate to how good of a service you will receive and how reasonable the price will be. Why do you shake your fist at the CEO when it’s the state which is the only entity capable of destroying your freedom of choice? The CEOs are just using what is available to them.

  • bobpax:

    HA!!! @ 13:54 Great!!!. Stef, how bout we line up some investors, hire a pro to write the screenplay, and call it “The Attack Of The Fifty Foot Statist” or if we run over budget, “The Statist That Time Forgot” A Documentary. Oh, by the way, Stef, start working on your acceptance speech for the “Awards” next year. Definitely a shoo in. No time like the present.

    As always, keep it coming.

    Pax

    Bob

  • sirscutter:

    another great screen capture portrait of the big chatty forehead

  • fiftycaliberfistfuck:

    I don’t get it. Why WOUDLN’T you rather spend gobs of money on taking care of your people, rather than spend gobs of money on the military to kill people. One is sane, the other, totally insane. Simply take 75% of the money that gets poured down the toilet of defense spending and put it on health care, and you’d cover those costs by 10x. No more taxpayer spending required, perhaps, even a lot less.

  • marniespeaks:

    @Agitpropist
    catch 22

  • yo1dude1man:

    Like the letter writer said – it is the Health Insurance Corporations that DECIDE on amount of payout for patient coverage. Why? Because the Health Insurance industry controls EVERYTHING. They decide who lives and who dies.
    This wasn’t a true free-market system designed for maximum coverage at the lowest possible price. This was some sort of sick Nazi-Fascist bull-sh!t, labeled as Capitalism, to exterminate the poor.

  • mihaiguy:

    I wish I could be as optimistic as you towards the end there, Stef.

  • rayyf69:

    @LeksServices Have you considered that many of these natural resources are publicly owned adn that the core of the problem is that some margin of the owners do not care about this thing they own? This apathy or low preference for the maintenance of these resources will result in policy decisions that automatically cause their destruction and depletion. If you want more collectivization wouldnt that mean integrating more marginal ownership rights to people who dont care about these resources ?

  • rayyf69:

    @LeksServices Have you read Marx’s sociological definition of capitalism ? If so then you must know Marx’s opinions of the state. You seem to gloss over the state as if it has no influence on the economic outcomes that result in class stratification, that demonstrates extreme bias. At least read some Marx.

  • RationalBullets:

    You have a point. Statist liberals are dissonant and very annoying

  • MRSketch09:

    @Vid/stefbot
    You talk about how the state is in its death throws…
    Do you mean like the states in the US? Or do you mean the US as a whole?

    Or are you talking about all governments in general?

    Just curious.

  • NoGuff:

    I just love how it’s going to be the IRS running our nationalized medicine.

    Could you possibly call it ironic seeing that its the Democraps who designed it this way? I don’t know. In a way, you had to see it coming, I guess.

    May God help us.

  • TigronX:

    Borrowers will come flying in like xtmas morning and consuming everything they can get their hands on, but everything is taxed. But who cares? Everything is so cheap. People will make that money back. Day traders in the stock market, for example, will have to pay a tax on every trade they make. Today a day trader can technically trade unlimited amount of times and not pay taxes unless his account closes with gains. But, who cares? Look at all the money coming in! It’s a stampede!

  • TigronX:

    Part 1: I don’t agree that the state monster is about to keel over and die. I think that face you saw is a monster doing a line of coke and getting ready to start the party. I see that the demand for credit has been dammed off. I see that the federal tax system will be reformed to the Fair Tax system, and then I see the credit floodgates opening like no tomorrow.

  • Agitpropist:

    @marniespeaks
    Neither, really.

  • Torakization:

    Boo Obama Care! Hands off my Bankster Care !

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  
Categories
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline